Downton Abbey Features Compelling Cap to Second Season

Note: This post contains spoilers.

It’s been quite the season for the Downton Abbey cast with compelling stories surrounding the war coming to a close by the year’s final episodes. The recently aired Christmas special wrapped it up with an elegance and dramatic flair that’s sure to keep fans waiting with bated breath.

Will Bates be free for Anna’s happiness to be complete, or will she walk the halls of Downton a ghost? Will Thomas learn to live with love in his life, or remain the cold, calculating brute that’s served as the catalyst for so much of the plot already? How about Daisy’s freedom, or Edith’s loneliness? Sybil seems to be taken care of with Branson, but what about Ethel and her young child Charlie? Then there’s O’Brien, who killed Lady Grantham’s child and only seemed to feel true remorse when Cora seemed to be on her deathbed with the Spanish flu. Will she grow a heart and confess, or remain silent on the subject?

These are all a matter of time, but the intricacy of each serves as a backdrop for the even larger and more compelling story: the love life of Matthew, the heir apparent, and Mary, the ruined eldest child.

With Lavinia out of the picture, and the two kissing passionately after Matthew’s wintry proposal (yes, he can walk again!), what’s to be next for the familial lovers, who’ve kept their passions a secret through war, death, scandal, and more?

This episode ended on a high note, but don’t we expect more from the brilliant work of Julian Fellowes? Certainly more than a gift perfectly wrapped up, all ends tied up neatly. That, I believe, is just what we’ll get as season three premieres in 2012.

Michele Bachmann, Stop. Just stop.

AP Photo

Well, it’s recently come to my attention — for the zillionth time — how much Michele Bachmann needs to simply just shut up about the topic of gay marriage. Seriously, Michele, you do not make sense, and it’s time to take a tip from Herman Cain. Drop out, please.

She recently made comments at an Iowa town hall meeting on the topic, getting bombarded with questions from kids, who know their stuff. She said to one girl: “They can get married, but they abide by the same law as everyone else. They can marry a man if they’re a woman. Or they can marry a woman if they’re a man.”

Michele, this doesn’t make sense.

Gay marriage doesn’t work that way, nor should anyone only have the option to marry or not marry another person based on their sex.

Furthermore, calling Iowa to repeal the passage the ’09 declaration that same-sex marriage in the state would be allowed is none of your business. It’s constitutional, and that’s that.

On the subject, she said: “Marriage, historically, for all human history has been between a man and a woman. It hasn’t been the same-sex marriage And remember that in Iowa, it was judges that made the decision — not the legislature, which are the people’s representatives, and certainly, not the people.”

Well, Michele, maybe you need to hear the heartfelt words of Zach Wahls. He knows a little bit more about the benefits of being the son of gay parents. Just a little.

Anyway, I needed to get this off my chest. The woman is crazy, and she shouldn’t be espousing these ill-informed beliefs. Hell, even other Republicans think she — and all the other presidential candidates — are crazy.

And so, sure, I’m a proponent of free speech — I am a journalist after all. But this stuff? No, it doesn’t make sense.

Thanks, Michele, for sharing. But, yeah…shut up.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 180 other followers